On-the-job training
On-the-job training supports young people’s engagement in work and training longer term, with marked positive impacts on apprenticeship participation.
Last updated: 26 August 2026Headline insights about this component based on current high-quality evidence
On-the-job training is associated with a low positive impact on employment at 24 months after the start of the intervention and is associated with higher wages and longer time spent employed.
It is also likely to be associated with a reduction in the number of young people who are NEET at 24 months after the start of an intervention (with >27% probability of a high positive impact).
On-the-job training has moderate positive impacts on work quality. It is associated with higher income from work (80% probability), and with a longer time spent in employment.
Young people who engage in on-the-job training may increase their participation in level 2 qualifications and apprenticeships.
The impact of on-the-job training on getting a level 2 qualification at 24 months after the start of an intervention is very small. However it is associated with a small positive impact on participation in qualifications of this kind, at the same time point.
It is also associated with increased participation in some kind of training, and with a 74% probability of having high positive impact on participation in apprenticeships.
Good quality apprenticeships – delivered to those who are well-equipped to pursue them – can have a positive effect on employment, especially for young people from marginalised backgrounds.
A recent process evaluation of the UK Government’s Kickstart Scheme indicates it may support young people to find paid employment with the providing employer, or progress into further education or training.
The scheme provided funding for further learning and training, alongside employer incentives to create new jobs for 16- to 24-year-olds on Universal Credit who were at risk of long-term unemployment. Three in ten young people who participated in the scheme were employed seven months after the scheme. And the majority who were in work said that the skills and experiences they gained had been important in helping them find work.
Young people are placed with an employer to gain experience in tasks associated with a job in the relevant workplace or sector, and to gain training in relevant technical and interpersonal skills.
In the context of the Toolkit, on-the-job training does not include qualifications and training that young people undertake independently or as part of the formal education system.
People aged 16 and over on employment benefits who are at risk of long-term unemployment.
Any UK organisation — business, charity, public-sector body or social enterprise — that meets legal requirements such as:
Most on-the-job training lasts lasts up to six months and sometimes longer, or occupies a number of hours within a larger programme.
On-the-job training programmes are independently funded by the central government.
On-the-job training can support young people to:
On-the-job training can help employers:
Calculations are based on insights from available high-quality studies on the complexity of delivery requirements and estimated associated costs.
Based on existing evidence, we’ve identified some common features that support the commissioning, design and delivery of effective youth employment programmes:
Design, fund and deliver outreach and recruitment activities that raise young people’s awareness, with targeted initiatives to reach under-represented group who are most likely to benefit.
This might include:
Discover more about risk factors associated with being NEET.
Also consider how best to identify and engage the most suitable delivery partners and employers for a programme. Engagement should be timely and clear, in ways that raise awareness and facilitate recruitment, enrolment, and sustained engagement.
Effective programmes may use direct community outreach activities for engaging under-served groups, alongside up-to-date local and administrative data, working with public employment services, or advertising vacancies along with eligibility criteria.
They also seek to match opportunities to young people’s interests and motivations, assessing via pre-programme information and orientation.
Establish effective pre-programme learning and orientation activities to bolster access to and completion of apprenticeships by
Explore the Learning and Work Institute’s guidance for developing skills.
Employers and providers can use the Skills Builder Universal Framework for identifying and addressing gaps.
Design, fund and deliver programmes that:
Effective programmes may utilise personal advisors or co-designed action plans that align with participants’ goals, aspirations and circumstances. These are most effective when used consistently.
Content and design vary depending on the sector in which off-the-job training takes place.
A strong relationship between policymakers, learning providers, employers, community organisations and local skills delivery organisations including Mayoral Strategic Authorities and Local Skills Improvement Plan areas supports effective youth employment support programmes.
Design, fund and deliver programmes that foster collaboration with education providers such as colleges to improve access to relevant teaching experience.
Many programmes align their content closely with opportunities and skills needs in the local labour market. This relies on strong partnerships with local employers as well as good-quality labour market intelligence. Flexibility within national programmes can help local providers to adapt to conditions in their region or sector, and to adjust in response to changing contexts and opportunities.
Employer input to programmes helps to align training with the needs of the local economy and with opportunities for further training or employment.
Support providers and delivery organisations to accurately and systematically capture and communicate data and milestones and track programme outcomes. This may include structured and standardised tracking forms, or developing realistic programme-specific performance frameworks.
For funders and commissioners – ensure recorded data, reporting and assessment captures a full range of appropriate and relevant youth employment and related outcomes to help rich understanding to ensure rich picture of what programmes do.
Encouraging reporting commonly recognised metrics allows evaluation to be easily comparable and included in the growing evidence base.
Design, fund and deliver programmes that:
| Included studies | 43 |
|---|---|
| Location(s) | High-income countries (mainly USA) |
| Outcome | Labour force status, earnings, employment duration, hours worked, and education & skills |
| Comparator | 'Services as usual' |
The Youth Employment Toolkit brings together evidence from robust studies in high-income countries that:
Find details of individual studies, as well as other systematic reviews of youth employment evaluations, in the Youth Employment Evidence and Gap Map.
More information about included studies can be found in page 55-60 of the full CNMA report. The specific evidence profile for on-the-job training can be found on page 178.
Studies were scored on reported design, sample size, approach to attrition, and definitions of interventions and outcome measures. More detail can be found in the technical guide.
The evidence strength ratings for on-the-job training reflect the comparatively smaller numbers of studies included in the meta-analysis.
On-the-job training has been under-evaluated in the UK. In the case of of the education outcome (school completion), a high proportion of evidence from a single country (the USA).
The evidence for vocational education and training has a lower confidence rating because of relative imprecision of the estimate.
Findings relate only to short-term on-the-job training as part of a youth employment programme. The following are excluded:
The current evidence can be strengthened by taking a consistent approach to incorporating standardised metrics for education, employment and training outcomes as well as outcomes that indicate work quality.
High-quality impact evaluations of programmes that feature an on-the-job training component in a UK context, particularly those provided to young people who face additional barriers to employment, would be of great value in identifying the most effective approaches to recruitment, design and delivery, as well as quantifying the costs and benefits in terms of employment and education outcomes.
If you have feedback or a question about the Toolkit, please get in touch.