Unpaid temporary work experience
Unpaid temporary work experience may increase participation in education and can be part of a pathway to longer-term employment.
Last updated: 26 August 2026Headline insights about this component based on current high-quality evidence
Unpaid temporary work experience may increase young people's engagement in education.
The median impact on school completion is in the ‘low positive’ range.
The component is also associated with higher levels of participation in degree-level study.
Data on training outcomes was not available or too limited to provide information on outcomes.
Unpaid temporary work experience could have a substantial positive impact on employment longer term, as well as increasing young people's income from work.
In the 12-24 months after the start of an intervention, unpaid temporary work experience is associated with a small negative impact on employment. However, at the 24 month point the impact on employment has over 90% chance of being is in the ‘high positive’ range.
Unpaid temporary work experience has a moderate positive impact on wages for young people who are in work. Data on other aspects of work quality was not available.
Impacts may be higher for older people in the 16-24 age group.
Unpaid temporary work experience is likely to reduce young people's chance of not being in education, employment or training at 24 months after the start of an intervention.
Young people are offered short-term roles with employers such as unpaid placements or internships.
Some unpaid temporary work experience interventions are designed to support young people who are long-term unemployed or at particular risk of marginalisation, such as disabled young people. These typically offer additional support to the young person and employer, for example through case worker support.
Internships are more likely to be offered to undergraduates and recent graduates. However, some opportunities for school leavers and college students can involve short term placements and opportunities to visit workplaces and/or shadow paid employees.
Any UK organisation — business, charity, public-sector body or social enterprise — that meets legal requirements such as:
Placements can vary considerably between periods of one or two weeks to three months or longer. The majority are relatively short.
Funding may come from diverse sources or from a mixture of sources including:
Unpaid temporary work experience can support individuals to:
Unpaid temporary work experience can support employers to:
Calculations are based on insights from available high-quality studies on the complexity of delivery requirements and estimated associated costs.
Based on existing evidence, we’ve identified some common features that support the commissioning, design and delivery of effective youth employment programmes:
Design, fund and deliver outreach and recruitment activities that raise young people’s awareness, with targeted initiatives to reach under-represented group who are most likely to benefit.
This might include:
Discover more about risk factors associated with being NEET.
Also consider how best to identify and engage the most suitable partners and employers for a programme. Engagement should be timely and clear, in ways that raise awareness and facilitate recruitment, enrolment, and sustained engagement.
Effective programmes may use direct community outreach activities for engaging under-served groups, alongside up-to-date local and administrative data, working with public employment services, or advertising vacancies along with eligibility criteria.
Some programmes mirror the process of applying for a job by advertising vacancies, or getting employers to advertise vacancies, so that young people can apply for them.
Design, fund and deliver programmes that:
Design, fund and deliver programmes that foster collaboration effective partnerships between employers and other stakeholders
Strong partnerships between employers, public institutions, support providers and communities can help to build and sustain successful programmes, as can collaborations between different providers of the same programme.
Support providers and delivery organisations to accurately and systematically capture and communicate data and milestones and track programme outcomes. This may include structured and standardised tracking forms, or developing realistic programme-specific performance frameworks.
For funders and commissioners – ensure recorded data, reporting and assessment captures a full range of appropriate and relevant youth employment and related outcomes to help rich understanding to ensure rich picture of what programmes do.
Encouraging reporting commonly recognised metrics allows evaluation to be easily comparable and included in the growing evidence base.
| Included studies | 18 |
|---|---|
| Location(s) | High-income countries |
| Outcome | Labour force status, earnings, employment duration, hours worked, and education & skills |
| Comparator | 'Services as usual' / Business as usual |
The Youth Employment Toolkit brings together evidence from robust studies in high-income countries that:
Find details of individual studies, as well as other systematic reviews of youth employment evaluations, in the Youth Employment Evidence and Gap Map.
More information about included studies can be found in page 55-60 of the full CNMA report. The specific evidence profile for unpaid work experience can be found on page 201.
The evidence strength ratings for unpaid temporary work experience reflect the number of studies included in the meta-analysis. Studies were scored on reported design, sample size, approach to attrition, and definitions of interventions and outcome measures. More detail can be found in the technical guide.
The following are not included in the definition of unpaid temporary work experience because they are discussed elsewhere in the Toolkit:
The research identified differences between the impacts of paid and unpaid work experience. This might reflect differences between the populations served, delivery contexts, or the combination of components provided alongside work experience.
Alternatively it might reflect factors associated with payment or non-payment, or with the slightly different average duration of programmes.
A better understanding of what drives these differences would help decision-makers to plan effective interventions for their context.
The current evidence can also be strengthened by taking a consistent approach to incorporating standardised metrics for education, employment and training outcomes as well as outcomes that indicate work quality.
If you have feedback or a question about the Toolkit, please get in touch.